From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Bynum

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 3, 1958
332 P.2d 202 (Or. 1958)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1958

Affirmed December 3, 1958

Appeal from Circuit Court, Linn County, VICTOR OLLIVER, Judge.

Sam Kyle, of Albany, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Weatherford Thompson, of Albany.

Asa L. Lewelling, of Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, McALLISTER and O'CONNELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


The plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a collision between plaintiff's and defendant's automobiles at the intersection of two rural roads. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in several particulars, including the usual allegations with respect to lookout, control, yielding the right of way, and improperly turning at an intersection. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout, drove his automobile at an unreasonable speed, and failed to yield the right of way. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff assigns as error the trial court's refusal to give certain requested instructions and the failure to give certain necessary instructions. The instructions given to the jury fully covered the issues raised in the pleadings. The instructions included the appropriate statements of the law relating to each of the allegations of negligence and contributory negligence. A party is entitled to have the theory of his case presented to the jury. Cline v. Bush, 152 Or. 63, 52 P.2d 652 (1935). He is not entitled to anything more than this. Denton v. Arnstein, 197 Or. 28, 250 P.2d 407 (1952). The instructions given in this case were wholly adequate to present the theory of the plaintiff's case.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Garrett v. Bynum

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 3, 1958
332 P.2d 202 (Or. 1958)
Case details for

Garrett v. Bynum

Case Details

Full title:GARRETT v. BYNUM

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 3, 1958

Citations

332 P.2d 202 (Or. 1958)
332 P.2d 202

Citing Cases

Lee v. Caldwell

As argued in the appellant's brief, both parties are entitled to have instructions based on their respective…