From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garret v. Trent

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1939
4 S.E.2d 319 (N.C. 1939)

Opinion

(Filed 20 September, 1939.)

Judgments § 22e —

It is error for the court to set aside a judgment on the ground of excusable neglect, C. S., 600, in the absence of a finding that defendant has a meritorious defense.

Two cases consolidated. Appeal by plaintiffs from order of Alley, J., at June Term, 1939, of ROCKINGHAM, setting aside judgments on the ground of excusable neglect, C. S., 600.

Sharp Sharp and Joe W. Garrett for plaintiffs, appellants.

Glidewell Glidewell for defendant, appellee.


There is an absence of any finding of the fact by the court that the defendant had meritorious defenses, and for this reason the judgments should not have been set aside. Cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N.C. 5; Hooks v. Neighbors, 211 N.C. 382.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Garret v. Trent

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1939
4 S.E.2d 319 (N.C. 1939)
Case details for

Garret v. Trent

Case Details

Full title:W. B. GARRETT v. E. H. TRENT and S.W. TURNER v. E. H. TRENT

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1939

Citations

4 S.E.2d 319 (N.C. 1939)
4 S.E.2d 319

Citing Cases

Craver v. Spaugh

Existence of a meritorious cause of action is a prerequisite to relief on the motion to vacate the former…