From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 14, 1930
125 So. 693 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

5 Div. 775.

January 14, 1930.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; W. B. Bowling, Judge.

Nolen Garner was convicted of unlawfully possessing a still, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


In his oral charge the court instructed the jury: "Gentlemen of the jury, the law says if he had in his possession any part of a still that was to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquor, why the effect would be the same as if he had the whole still in his possession."

This charge is not in accord with the uniform holding of this court. Pate v. State, 19 Ala. App. 642, 99 So. 833; Berry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 102, 100 So. 922; Lindsey v. State, 18 Ala. App. 494, 93 So. 331.

Section 4657 of the Code of 1923 does not create a crime, but is a rule of evidence. The crime is fixed by the preceding section.

For obvious reasons, we do not discuss the evidence.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Garner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 14, 1930
125 So. 693 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Garner v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARNER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jan 14, 1930

Citations

125 So. 693 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
125 So. 693

Citing Cases

Little v. State

The oral charge of the court was erroneous. Dabbs v. State, 20 Ala. App. 167, 101 So. 220; Wilson v. State,…