From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garner v. Sanders

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Sep 4, 2009
Case No. 08-6031 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 08-6031.

September 4, 2009


ORDER


Now on this 4th day of September 2009, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July 20, 2009, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 31). Also before the Court are written objections to the report and recommendation filed by both Plaintiff and Defendants. (Docs. 34 37).

The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. The Court has reviewed the additional medication ledgers submitted by Defendants, however, Plaintiff denies he received all of the medication as noted, and Sgt. Ansley was also involved in the decision to not seek medical attention for Plaintiff following his fall. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claim of unconstitutional conditions of confinement is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, Plaintiff's claim for denial of medical care against Sheriff Sanders is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Sheriff Sanders is dismissed as a defendant. This matter will proceed with Plaintiff's denial of medical care claim against Sgt. Ansley.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Garner v. Sanders

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division
Sep 4, 2009
Case No. 08-6031 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Garner v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DEAN GARNER PLAINTIFF v. SHERIFF LARRY SANDERS and SGT. ANSLEY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division

Date published: Sep 4, 2009

Citations

Case No. 08-6031 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Paige v. Murray

The cases upon which defendants rely in support of their position are distinguishable because in those cases,…

Paige v. Murray

The cases upon which defendants rely in support of their position are distinguishable because in those cases,…