Opinion
Argued June 25, 1883
Decided October 2, 1883
Richard H. Huntley for appellants.
Alex. Thain for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting, and ANDREWS, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Garner v. Mangam
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 2, 1883
93 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1883)
Summaries of
Garner v. Mangam
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 2, 1883
93 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1883)
Case details for
Garner v. Mangam
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM H. GARNER, Respondent, v . DARIUS R. MANGAM et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 2, 1883
Citations
93 N.Y. 642 (N.Y. 1883)
Citing Cases
Townsend v. Hirshkind. No. 1
The appellant contends that since his version of the transaction showed that he was induced to execute the…
Taylor v. Commercial BankIt is an established principle of law that where a person acts for another who accepts the fruits of his…