Summary
upholding conviction based on fingerprint evidence where “[t]here was no evidence presenting any other reasonable explanation” for presence of defendant's prints at scene of crime
Summary of this case from In the Interest of H. A.Opinion
62418.
DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1981.
Action on note. Forsyth State Court. Before Judge Gault.
Jane Kent-Plaginos, for appellant.
Louis F. Ricciuti, for appellee.
The nonjury judgment for plaintiff in this action to collect the balance due on a promissory note admittedly executed by the appellant for value is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.
Judgment affirmed. Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.