From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 71644 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 71644

08-16-2017

ARMANDO GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Armando Garcia appeals from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of four counts of possession of a credit or debit card without cardholder's consent and one count each of conspiracy to commit robbery, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, first-degree kidnapping with use of a deadly weapon, robbery with use of a deadly weapon, assault with use of a deadly weapon, battery with intent to commit a crime, battery with use of a deadly weapon, and discharge of a weapon where a person might be endangered. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

Garcia contends the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by asking a detective whether he could tell when someone was being truthful with him. We review claims of prosecutorial misconduct for improper conduct and then determine whether reversal is warranted. Valdez v. State, 124 Nev. 1172, 1188, 196 P.3d 465, 476 (2008). Because Garcia preserved this issue, we review for harmless error. See id. Although the questioning was improper, we conclude the error was harmless and did not substantially affect the jury's verdict because overwhelming evidence supports the verdict, the detective's answer was stricken, and the jury was instructed to disregard it. See id; see also Hymon v. State, 121 Nev. 200, 211, 111 P.3d 1092, 1100 (2005) (presuming the jury follows instructions). Further, the question did not infect the proceedings so as to impair Garcia's due process right to a fair trial. See Valdez, at 1192, 196 P.3d at 478-79. We therefore deny this claim.

To the extent Garcia challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, he has not presented any relevant authority and cogent argument in support of this contention, and we do not consider it. See Maresca v. State, 103 Nev. 669, 673, 748 P.2d 3, 6 (1987).

For the foregoing reasons, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge

Law Offices of John P. Parris

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2017
No. 71644 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO GARCIA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

No. 71644 (Nev. App. Aug. 16, 2017)