The petitioner, an inmate at the Allenwood Federal Prison Camp, Montgomery, Pennsylvania, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) on May 23, 1989. The petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on July 24, 1989. On January 19, 1990, United States Magistrate Raymond J. Durkin filed a report in which he recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

The time period in which the petitioner is permitted to file objections to the report has lapsed, and no objections have been filed. Nor has the petitioner requested an extension of time in which to file objections. When a Magistrate makes a finding or ruling on a motion or issue, his determination should become that of the court unless objections are filed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-153, 106 S.Ct. 466, 472-474, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Moreover, when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error or manifest injustice. Cf: Bell v. Warner, M.D.Pa. Civil Number 85-0732 (Order, Muir, J., September 25, 1985), at Slip Op. p. 2, citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982); on remand, 677 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1982); Sullivan v. Cuyler, 723 F.2d 1077, 1085 (3d Cir. 1983).

The petitioner, a Mariel Cuban refugee, has filed the instant habeas corpus petition to challenge a detainer lodged against him by the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service [hereinafter "INS"]. The lodging of a detainer does not subject the petitioner to INS custody. As a result, the petitioner may not challenge the INS detainer by filing a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 absent actual custody by the INS. D'Ambrosio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 710 F. Supp. 269 (N.D.Cal. 1989); Campillo v. Sullivan, 853 F.2d 593 (8th Cir. 1988).

Accordingly, we shall adopt the report of the Magistrate and dismiss the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Summaries of

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Feb 13, 1990

733 F. Supp. 1554 (M.D. Pa. 1990)

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Cruz-Arroyo

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Velez-Medina

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Rosario-Cintron

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Arroyo-Medina

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Cintron-Boglio v. United States

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Encarnacion-Montero v. United States

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Puerto Rico Elec. Power Auth.

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Markel Am. Ins. Co. v. Veras

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from Camilo v. Nieves

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from United States v. Montijo-Gonzalez

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Martinez

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from González-Ríos v. Hewlett Packard P.R. Co.

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Colón-Díaz v. United Statesa

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Hall v. Centro Cardiovascular de P.R. y del Caribe

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Barreto–Rivera v. United States

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Torres–Santiago v. United States

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Mendez–Martinez v. Caribbean Alliance Ins. Co.

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Coors Brewing Co. v. Mendez–torres

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Estate of Serracante v. Esso Standard Oil

finding that “when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error”

Summary of this case from Brauchitsch–monedero v. P.R. Electric Power Auth.

finding that "when no objections are filed, the district court need only review the record for plain error"

Summary of this case from Rivot-Sanchez v. Warner Chilcott Company, Inc.

ruling that the 'lodging of a detainer does not subject petitioner to [ICE] custody' and, as a result, the petitioner could not file for habeas corpus relief

Summary of this case from Drabovskiy v. United States

ruling that the "lodging of a detainer does not subject petitioner to [ICE] custody" and, as a result, the petitioner could not file for habeas corpus relief

Summary of this case from Polzer v. Piazza

ruling that the "lodging of a detainer does not subject petitioner to [ICE] custody" and, as a result, the petitioner could not file for habeas corpus relief

Summary of this case from Mendoza v. Dist. Dir. for Immigration Custom Enfor

stating "the district court need only review the record for plain error or manifest injustice"

Summary of this case from Patton v. Berryhill

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Summary

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Summary

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Garcia v. Immig. Naturalization Serv.

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations