Opinion
B143330
Filed December 14, 2000 REVIEW GRANTED
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Garcetti v. Superior Court
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five
Dec 14, 2000
85 Cal.App.4th 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
Summaries of
Garcetti v. Superior Court
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five
Dec 14, 2000
85 Cal.App.4th 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
upholding use of PCL—R, RRASOR and Static 99
Summary of this case from State v. GordonIn Garcetti, the State's expert psychiatrist relied on the Static-99 as a basis in formulating an opinion on the respondent's future dangerousness.
Summary of this case from People v. TaylorIn Garcetti v. Superior Court, 102 Cal.Rptr. 2d 214, 239 (Ct.App.), review granted, (March 21, 2001), the court held that the Static 99, "a psychological instrument that uses an actuarial method to produce a profile of a person's likelihood of reoffense with an accuracy rate of over 70 percent, and that is supplemented or adjusted by use of clinical factors, can form the basis for an expert opinion on future dangerousness."
Summary of this case from In re of R.SCase details for
Garcetti v. Superior Court
Case Details
Full title:GIL GARCETTI, as District Attorney, etc., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five
Date published: Dec 14, 2000
Citations
85 Cal.App.4th 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214
Citing Cases
People v. Taylor
Relying on two California decisions, the trial court stated that the psychiatric or psychological testimony…
Roeling v. StateSee, e.g., In re Detention of Thorell, 149 Wash.2d 724, 72 P.3d 708 (2003); State v. Fields, 201 Ariz. 321,…