From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GAMMOH v. CITY OF LA HABRA

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 2005
402 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 04-56072.

Argued and Submitted November 1, 2004.

Filed January 26, 2005. Amended April 1, 2005.

Scott W. Wellman and Stuart Miller, Wellman Warren, Laguna Hills, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Deborah J. Fox and Dawn A. McIntosh, Fox Sohagi, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Scott D. Bergthold, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Amicus Curiae League of California Cities.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-00911-GLT.

Before: TASHIMA, FISHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The court's opinion, filed January 26, 2005, is amended as follows:

The second paragraph on slip op. 1131, under heading "C", line 3: the words "leaves open" are deleted and replaced with, "does not unreasonably limit".

Slip op. 1135, first paragraph, line 2: the word "ample" shall be inserted between "open" and "alternative".

With these amendments, Judges Fisher and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Tashima so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. No judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.


Summaries of

GAMMOH v. CITY OF LA HABRA

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 26, 2005
402 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

GAMMOH v. CITY OF LA HABRA

Case Details

Full title:Bill Badi GAMMOH, dba Taboo Theater aka Pelican Theater; Leslie West…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 2005

Citations

402 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Vivid Entertainment, LLC v. Fielding

First, the ordinance must regulate “speech that is sexual or pornographic in nature.” Gammoh v. City of La…

Roop v. Ryan

"The takings clause of the Fifth Amendment protects private property from being taken for public use without…