Galvis Mujica v. Occ. Pet

Full title: Luis Alberto GALVIS MUJICA, on behalf of himself and as representative of…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 11, 2009

564 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 05-56056, 05-56175, 05-56178.

Argued and Submitted April 19, 2007. Submission Deferred August 23, 2007. Resubmitted May 11, 2009.

Filed May 11, 2009.

Bridget Arimond and Douglas W. Cassel, Center for International Human Rights, Northwestern University Law School, Chicago, IL; Terry Collingsworth, International Labor Rights Fund, Washington, D.C.; Paul L. Hoffman, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris Hoffman, Venice, CA; Daniel M. Kovalik, Pittsburgh, PA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Manuel F. Cachn, Daniel P. Collins, Daniel L. Geyser, and John W. Spiegel, Munger, Tolles Olson, Los Angeles, CA; Kristin Linsley Myles, Munger, Tolles Olson, San Francisco, CA, for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant Occidental Petroleum Corporation.

Kenneth J. Berke, Berke Kent, Calabasas, CA; Sara M. Fotopulos and Thomas E. Fotopulos, Fotopulos Fotopulos, Riverview, FL, for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant Airscan, Inc.

Marco B. Simons and Richard L. Herz, Earthrights International, Washington, D.C., for the amicus Earthrights International.

William J. Aceves, California Western School of Law, San Diego, CA; Sarah H. Cleveland, Columbia Law School, New York, NY; William S. Dodge, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA, for the amicus Constitutional and International Law Professors.

Ralph G. Steinhardt, George Washington University School of Law, Washington, D.C., for the amicus International Law Scholars.

Tyler Giannini, Cambridge, MA, for the amicus U.S. Career Foreign Service Diplomats.

John B. Bellinger, III, Gregory Katsas, Douglas N. Letter, Robert M. Loeb, Sharon Swingle, and Debra Wong Yang, for the amicus The United States.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-02860-WJR.

Before JEROME FARRIS and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges, and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY,^_ Senior District Judge.

_ The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

ORDER

In light of the intervening authority of Sarei v. Rio Tinto, 550 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), this case is remanded to the district court to consider whether a prudential exhaustion requirement applies in this case, and if so, whether that requirement bars any claims in this case. On remand, the district court should also consider the effect, if any, of the decision of the Council of State of the Republic of Colombia in Mario Galvis Gelves, et al. v. The Nation, slip op. (Council of State, Rep. of Colombia, Ad. Law Div., Sec. 3, Dec. 13, 2007) and the decision of the Court No. 12 for Criminal Matters of the Circuit of Bogot of the Republic of Colombia in In re Cesare Romero Pradilla, et al., slip op. (Sept. 21, 2007).

REMANDED.