From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallagher v. Koppers Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1983
142 Cal.App.3d 713 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

In Gallagher v. Koppers, 142 Cal.App.3d 713, 716, 191 Cal.Rptr. 241, 245 (1983), a paint company's manufacturing operations in California were considered irrelevant to the choice of law issue in a products liability suit involving an injury caused by paint that the defendant manufactured in Oregon.

Summary of this case from McGhee v. Arabian American Oil Co.

Opinion

1983.


[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 714 — 726 CONTAINING GALLAGHER v. KOPPERS CO. AND PEOPLE v. TILCOCK HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by orders dated July 14, 1983, and July 27, 1983.


Summaries of

Gallagher v. Koppers Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1983
142 Cal.App.3d 713 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)

In Gallagher v. Koppers, 142 Cal.App.3d 713, 716, 191 Cal.Rptr. 241, 245 (1983), a paint company's manufacturing operations in California were considered irrelevant to the choice of law issue in a products liability suit involving an injury caused by paint that the defendant manufactured in Oregon.

Summary of this case from McGhee v. Arabian American Oil Co.
Case details for

Gallagher v. Koppers Co.

Case Details

Full title:Gallagher v. Koppers Co. and People v. Tilcock

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1983

Citations

142 Cal.App.3d 713 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

McGhee v. Arabian American Oil Co.

California courts have rejected arguments that a party's contacts with California, unrelated to the cause of…