From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GAIK v. TRAVELERS INS. CO

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Aug 13, 1999
191 F.3d 455 (7th Cir. 1999)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that the employer took prompt remedial action to end sexual harassment of an employee rubbing his penis against the victim's backside while she was working, among other things, because the harasser was instructed to avoid contact with the victim, counseled on ending the harassment, the victim was reassigned to a cubicle to minimize contact with the employee, and the harassment ceased despite subsequent staring from the employee

Summary of this case from Tucker v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 97-3734.

August 13, 1999.

N.D.Ill.

DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Affirmed

Summaries of

GAIK v. TRAVELERS INS. CO

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Aug 13, 1999
191 F.3d 455 (7th Cir. 1999)

holding that the employer took prompt remedial action to end sexual harassment of an employee rubbing his penis against the victim's backside while she was working, among other things, because the harasser was instructed to avoid contact with the victim, counseled on ending the harassment, the victim was reassigned to a cubicle to minimize contact with the employee, and the harassment ceased despite subsequent staring from the employee

Summary of this case from Tucker v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

finding significantly diminished material responsibilities where the plaintiff "no longer supervises or coordinates the work of any other employees and does not have any involvement with the budget," and where the employee's "only duties are to answer telephones, do some filing, and schedule some meetings"

Summary of this case from Baloch v. Norton
Case details for

GAIK v. TRAVELERS INS. CO

Case Details

Full title:Gaik v. Travelers Ins. Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 1999

Citations

191 F.3d 455 (7th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Tucker v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

lity because it immediately took action to protect Tucker while the investigation was pending, and then…

Yudkin v. Rubenstein

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) provides that the Court will review recommendations on dispositive…

16 Citing Cases