From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gage Van Horn Assoc. v. Tatom

Supreme Court of Texas
Jun 20, 2002
87 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. 2002)

Opinion

No. 00-1003

Argued on November 6, 2001

Opinion Delivered: June 20, 2002.

On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District of Texas

Tom H. Whiteside and Julie Cathryn Shoop, for petitioner.

Charles M. Walls, for respondent.


The principal issue in this case is whether the Covenants Not to Compete Act, Texas Business Commerce Code section 15.50 et. seq., controls the award of attorney's fees in a declaratory judgment action in which a court declares a covenant not to compete unenforceable. We granted the petition for review to consider this issue of first impression. However, after examining the record, we conclude that the issue was not preserved. Accordingly, we withdraw this Court's April 26, 2001 order granting the petition for review as improvidently granted. The petition for review is denied.


Summaries of

Gage Van Horn Assoc. v. Tatom

Supreme Court of Texas
Jun 20, 2002
87 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. 2002)
Case details for

Gage Van Horn Assoc. v. Tatom

Case Details

Full title:Gage Van Horn Associates, Inc., Petitioner v. Neil Tatom, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Jun 20, 2002

Citations

87 S.W.3d 536 (Tex. 2002)

Citing Cases

BioTE Med. v. Carrozzella

Although the Covenants Not to Compete Act does not bear this formal subtitle, the Subchapter containing its…