From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gadson v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHNSTOWN
Jun 21, 2016
3:15-CV-00040-KRG (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2016)

Summary

dismissing Eighth Amendment claim with prejudice holding that, "[t]aking all of the allegations in the complaint as true, Plaintiff has failed to allege the personal involvement of Defendants Weidlich and Burk in the alleged confiscation of his orthopedic shoes or orthotic heel lift inserts."

Summary of this case from Miller v. Ferguson

Opinion

3:15-CV-00040-KRG

06-21-2016

ERIC GADSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE #1, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; JOHN DOE #2, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; NORMAN WEIDLICH, ASST. HEALTH SVC. ADMIN.; AND P.A. STEVEN BURK, FCI LORETTO; Defendants,


MEMORANDUM ORDER KIM R. GIBSON, United States District Judge.

The present action was filed with this Court on February 13, 2015. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 34] on November 16, 2015. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 37] recommended that the motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment be granted and Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice and the case be marked closed. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on all parties. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2 they had until June 10, 2016 to file any objections. Plaintiff timely filed objections thereto on June 6, 2016. After a review of the objections, I find that they are without merit.

Accordingly, after a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice and the case be marked CLOSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 37] of Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy is hereby adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

By the Court,

/s/_________

The Honorable Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge cc: The Honorable Cynthia Reed Eddy

United States District Court

Western District of Pennsylvania

ERIC GADSON

35588-019

LORETTO

FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Inmate Mail/Parcels

P.O. BOX 1000

LORETTO, PA 15940

Paul D. Kovac

United States Attorney's Office

700 Grant Street

Suite 4000

Pittsburgh, PA 15219


Summaries of

Gadson v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHNSTOWN
Jun 21, 2016
3:15-CV-00040-KRG (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2016)

dismissing Eighth Amendment claim with prejudice holding that, "[t]aking all of the allegations in the complaint as true, Plaintiff has failed to allege the personal involvement of Defendants Weidlich and Burk in the alleged confiscation of his orthopedic shoes or orthotic heel lift inserts."

Summary of this case from Miller v. Ferguson
Case details for

Gadson v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:ERIC GADSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE #1, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; JOHN DOE #2…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHNSTOWN

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

Citations

3:15-CV-00040-KRG (W.D. Pa. Jun. 21, 2016)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Ferguson

Accord, Gadson v. John Doe #1, Corr Officer, Civ. A. No. 15-40, 2016 WL 3469383, at *4 (W.D. Pa. May 24,…