finding the plaintiff's South Carolina public policy claim appropriately dismissed where the employee had a remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Ellington v. Metro. Sec. Servs., Inc.97-1499.
November 23, 1998.
Appeal from D.Md.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
finding the plaintiff's South Carolina public policy claim appropriately dismissed where the employee had a remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Ellington v. Metro. Sec. Servs., Inc.finding that plaintiff was aware of the conduct that allegedly violated his rights because he filed a grievance specifically referring to that conduct
Summary of this case from Mayhew v. ILA Local 1771concluding the plaintiff failed to show a prima facie case of age discrimination where the company canceled its announcement for a vacant position, placed a lateral transfer in the position without a promotion, and did not utilize a competitive selection process to fill the position, as the plaintiff “was not rejected within the meaning of McDonnell Douglas ”
Summary of this case from Goree v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.applying South Carolina law and holding public policy discharge claim was not allowed where employee had remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Young v. Argos U.S., LLCnoting 16(b) considers diligence of party seeking amendment, not lack of bad faith or prejudice to opposing party
Summary of this case from Earle v. City of Huntingtonnoting 16(b) considers diligence of party seeking amendment, not lack of bad faith or prejudice to opposing party
Summary of this case from Lawhon v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LPapplying South Carolina law and holding public policy discharge claim not allowed where employee had remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Mullins v. Nucor Corp.noting 16(b) considers diligence of party seeking amendment, not lack of bad faith or prejudice to opposing party
Summary of this case from Scott Hutchison Enters., Inc. v. Cranberry Pipeline Corp.applying South Carolina law and holding public policy discharge claim not allowed where employee had remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Cooper v. Richland Cnty. Recreation Comm'napplying South Carolina law and holding public policy discharge claim not allowed where employee had remedy under Title VII
Summary of this case from Bryant v. Richland Cnty. Recreation Comm'naddressing plaintiff's need to provide evidence that the employees dealt with the same supervisor, were subject to the same standards, and engaged in the same conduct without such mitigating circumstances that would distinguish their conduct or the employer's treatment of them for it
Summary of this case from Hickman v. KucharskiFull title:E. David Gable Associates v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Nov 23, 1998
Later, the Court clarified part of the Bond language and strongly constrained the notion of substantial…
Todd v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueWe have accepted such a concession in the past. Hewitt v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 258, 266, 1997 WL 668995…