From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furman v. Furman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 23, 1945
269 App. Div. 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Summary

In Furman v. Walter, 13 How. Pr. 348, Judge Paige said: "The attachment under the Code is not original process; by it suit is not commenced, * * * nor upon it alone can a judgment be obtained, but it is a provisional remedy adopted in a suit already commenced.

Summary of this case from Italian Importing Co. v. Spodaro

Opinion

May 23, 1945.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to any party, and a new trial granted, on the ground that the proof as set forth in the stipulated facts does not sustain the judgment. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs, as academic in view of the decision on the appeal from the judgment. All concur. (The judgment cancels of record a deed of realty to plaintiff and awards title and possession of said property to defendant Walter F. Furman; the order denies plaintiff's motion to set aside the judgment and grants defendant's cross motion to allow the use of a copy of the order of reference signed by Judge MALONEY, the original having been lost.)


Summaries of

Furman v. Furman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 23, 1945
269 App. Div. 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

In Furman v. Walter, 13 How. Pr. 348, Judge Paige said: "The attachment under the Code is not original process; by it suit is not commenced, * * * nor upon it alone can a judgment be obtained, but it is a provisional remedy adopted in a suit already commenced.

Summary of this case from Italian Importing Co. v. Spodaro
Case details for

Furman v. Furman

Case Details

Full title:ROSE FURMAN, Appellant, v. WALTER F. FURMAN, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 23, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 811 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Sulzbacher v. Cawthra

conferring the right to make the application and section 683 prescribing the practice upon it. They contain…

Italian Importing Co. v. Spodaro

The summons here was, therefore, lawfully issued and served. In Furman v. Walter, 13 How. Pr. 348, Judge…