From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Furman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 27, 1967
381 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 23755.

July 27, 1967.

Frank C. Decker, Samuel L. Payne, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioners.

Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Gilbert E. Andrews, Donald W. Williamson, Jr., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Lester R. Uretz, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Christopher J. Ray, Atty., I.R.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before PHILLIPS, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.


This case involves the validity for federal income tax purposes of a so-called "Clifford Type Trust". The Tax Court in a decision reported at 45 T.C. 360, found upon undisputed and almost entirely stipulated facts that the Trust lacked "economic reality", and should not be recognized for tax purposes. For the reasons given and upon the authorities cited by the Tax Court, we affirm. See Van Zandt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir. 1965, 341 F.2d 440, certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 814, 86 S.Ct. 32, 15 L.Ed.2d 62. Compare, Skemp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir. 1948, 168 F.2d 598.

See Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331, 60 S.Ct. 554, 84 L.Ed. 788; and Internal Revenue Code of 1954, Secs. 671-678 (26 U.S.C. 1964 Ed., Secs. 671-678).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Furman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 27, 1967
381 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Furman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Irvine K. FURMAN and Lorena K. Furman, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 27, 1967

Citations

381 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Penn v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Cf. Kirschenmann v. Westover, 225 F.2d 69 (C.A. 9), certiorari denied 350 U.S. 834. Finally, although the…