From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fund Manager v. Corbin

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jul 7, 1989
161 Ariz. 364 (Ariz. 1989)

Summary

approving retroactive statutory validation of payment for services already rendered to state agency

Summary of this case from Arizona Center for Law v. Hassell

Opinion

No. CV-88-0418-PR.

April 13, 1989. Reconsideration Denied July 7, 1989.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County; William P. Sargeant, III, Marilyn A. Riddel, Judges.

Eaton, Lazarus Dodge, Ltd. by David D. Dodge, Marc R. Lieberman and Susan G. Sendrow, Phoenix, for plaintiff/appellee, defendant/appellee.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Anthony B. Ching, Sol. Gen., Phoenix, for defendant/appellant, plaintiff/appellant.

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest by David S. Baron, Tucson, for amicus curiae.


OPINION


Because the retroactivity of the statute in question, on the facts of this case, served only to validate a payment for services already rendered, the moral obligation of the State to pay for those services would justify either a legislative bill authorizing such payment or, as here, a bill excusing repayment. See Udall v. State Loan Board, 35 Ariz. 1, 273 P. 721 (1929). Furthermore, the legislature may retroactively validate the method by which a public body purchases goods or services. See Southern California Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 38 Cal.3rd 64, 67, 211 Cal.Rptr. 99, 101, 695 P.2d 186, 188 (1985) ("the Legislature may supply retroactively, through a curative or validating act, any authority it could have provided prospectively through an enabling act"). We need not, therefore, reach the issue of whether the claim by the Attorney General had vested.

Except for the discussion of when a substantive legal right vests, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is approved. Appellees are awarded their attorneys' fees on appeal in an amount to be determined upon the filing of the statement required by Rule 21(c), Ariz.R.Civ.App.Proc., 17B A.R.S. The judgment in favor of the Fund Manager is affirmed. The appeal against Eaton, Lazarus, Dodge Lowry, Ltd. is dismissed.

FELDMAN, V.C.J., and CAMERON, CLABORNE, and MINKER, JJ., concur.

GORDON, C.J., MOELLER and CORCORAN, JJ., did not participate in this decision; pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 3.

LIVERMORE, Judge, Court of Appeals, Division Two, CLABORNE, Judge, Court of Appeals, Division One, and ALLEN G. MINKER, Judge, Greenlee County Superior Court were designated to sit in their stead.


Summaries of

Fund Manager v. Corbin

Supreme Court of Arizona
Jul 7, 1989
161 Ariz. 364 (Ariz. 1989)

approving retroactive statutory validation of payment for services already rendered to state agency

Summary of this case from Arizona Center for Law v. Hassell
Case details for

Fund Manager v. Corbin

Case Details

Full title:THE FUND MANAGER, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System…

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Jul 7, 1989

Citations

161 Ariz. 364 (Ariz. 1989)
778 P.2d 1260

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Woods v. Block

In Arizona, the Attorney General has no common law powers; "whatever powers he possesses must be found in the…

State v. Chastain

See also Hansen v. Barlow, 23 Utah 2d 47, 456 P.2d 177, 178 (1969). Finally, in Fund Manager v. Corbin, 161…