From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRYE v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1327 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-1327 (JNE/JJG).

August 29, 2006


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated June 13, 2006, the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be denied, that defendant Gregory Lucas-Silvis' motion to dismiss be granted, that Plaintiff's claim aga inst Lucas-Silvis be dismissed with prejudice, and that Lucas-Silvis' motion to amend be denied as moot. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [Docket No. 113] is DENIED.
2. Lucas-Silvis' motion to dismiss [Docket No. 141] is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's claim against Lucas-Silvis is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. Lucas-Silvis' motion to amend [Docket No. 178] is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

FRYE v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 29, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1327 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

FRYE v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Case Details

Full title:James Wayne Frye, Plaintiff, v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

Civ. No. 05-1327 (JNE/JJG) (D. Minn. Aug. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Saylor v. Frakes

, because Hale failed to establish a connection between these injuries and the conduct he challenged in his…

Laughlin v. Stuart

(citation omitted); see also Green v. Doe, No. 16-cv-3945 (PJS/SER), 2018 WL 1023784, at *9 (D. Minn. Jan.…