finding plaintiff must prove fact or causation of antitrust injury
Summary of this case from CEDAR RAPIDS DIV. ACT v. SYLVAN LEARNING SYSNo. 92-863.
January 19, 1993, OCTOBER TERM, 1992.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 978 F. 2d 1093.
finding plaintiff must prove fact or causation of antitrust injury
Summary of this case from CEDAR RAPIDS DIV. ACT v. SYLVAN LEARNING SYSstating "[i]f a plaintiff has suffered financial loss from the lawful activities of a competitor, then no damages may be recovered under the antitrust laws"
Summary of this case from ACT, INC. v. SYLVAN LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC.Full title:FRITO-LAY, INC., ET AL. v. WAITS
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 19, 1993
Moreover, the lower courts who have encountered the issue have taken widely divergent approaches to resolve…
Study Logic, LLC v. Clear Net Plus, Inc.When a default judgment is entered, the defendant is deemed to have admitted all well-pleaded allegations in…