stating that benefit of the bargain is a measure of damages for a breach of contract
Summary of this case from Kruger v. Credit Int'l Corp.No. 42003-8-I.
March 1, 1999. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-22939-5, Michael J. Trickey, J., entered November 19, 1997.
Reversed by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Coleman and Cox, JJ.
stating that benefit of the bargain is a measure of damages for a breach of contract
Summary of this case from Kruger v. Credit Int'l Corp.In Sahalee, the Court specifically recognized three appraisal methods approved by the American Appraisal Institute. Sahalee, 108 Wn.2d at 33.
Summary of this case from Beal v. Lopezrefusing to characterize the Friebes' “ ‘legal sleight-of-hand’ ” in waiting a year and two days to collect on a default judgment “as unfair or deceptive”
Summary of this case from Trinity Universal Ins. Co. of Kan. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.refusing to characterize the Friebes' “ ‘legal sleight-of-hand’ ” in waiting a year and two days to collect on a default judgment “as unfair or deceptive”
Summary of this case from Trinity Universal Ins. Co. of Kan. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.Full title:HAROLD FRIEBE, SR., ET AL., Appellants , v. JAMES SUPANCHECK, ET AL.…
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Date published: Mar 1, 1999
Tokio argued before the trial court that its failure to appear in the action was due to the fact that the…
Investment Fund v. City of TacomaThere is no fraud or misconduct in waiting over one year to begin collecting on a judgment. Friebe v.…