From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frey v. Stowitzky

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 31, 2007
NO. 2:06-cv-4490 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2007)

Summary

finding unexhausted claims procedurally defaulted where PCRA petition was dismissed as untimely and further attempt to return to state court would be untimely

Summary of this case from Bowen v. Palkovich

Opinion

NO. 2:06-cv-4490.

May 31, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2007, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Frey v. Stowitzky

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 31, 2007
NO. 2:06-cv-4490 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2007)

finding unexhausted claims procedurally defaulted where PCRA petition was dismissed as untimely and further attempt to return to state court would be untimely

Summary of this case from Bowen v. Palkovich
Case details for

Frey v. Stowitzky

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GEORGE FREY, JR, Petitioner v. PAUL J. STOWITZKY, SUPERINTENDENT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 31, 2007

Citations

NO. 2:06-cv-4490 (E.D. Pa. May. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Pennsylvania

However, even if we could deem that she preserved this claim of improper sentencing credit in the PCRA trial…

DIAMOND v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA

Such state law waiver rules are independent and adequate state law grounds that bar federal habeas review.…