From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

May, 1934.


Order in so far as it dismisses the complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law, motion to dismiss the complaint denied, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court had no power to dismiss the complaint after the rendering of the verdict where it had previously denied a motion to dismiss the complaint when both sides rested before the submission to the jury. ( Griffith v. Southfield Beach Railroad Co., 240 App. Div. 845; Owens v. Jaller, Id. 856.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Freund v. Telmar Amusement Corporation

Case Details

Full title:RHODA R. FREUND, Appellant, v. TELMAR AMUSEMENT CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 880 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Richter

Numerous holdings, old and new, are of similar effect. Some of them are as follows: Wright and Another v.…