From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1987
188 Cal.App.3d 700 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

In Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co. (1987) 188 Cal.App.3d 700 [233 Cal.Rptr. 544] (time for granting or den. review extended to May 18, 1987), the court held the defendants' declarations, that they lacked knowledge of any peril and that they did not commit willful or malicious misconduct, were insufficient evidence on which to grant their motions for summary judgment under section 846 Because willful or malicious misconduct is measured by an objective standard, a defendant's selfserving subjective statement does not suffice to negate such misconduct.

Summary of this case from Charpentier v. Von Geldern

Opinion

1987.


[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 701 — 722 CONTAINING FREITAS v. J.G. BOSWELL CO. HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated May 14, 1987.


Summaries of

Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1987
188 Cal.App.3d 700 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)

In Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co. (1987) 188 Cal.App.3d 700 [233 Cal.Rptr. 544] (time for granting or den. review extended to May 18, 1987), the court held the defendants' declarations, that they lacked knowledge of any peril and that they did not commit willful or malicious misconduct, were insufficient evidence on which to grant their motions for summary judgment under section 846 Because willful or malicious misconduct is measured by an objective standard, a defendant's selfserving subjective statement does not suffice to negate such misconduct.

Summary of this case from Charpentier v. Von Geldern
Case details for

Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co.

Case Details

Full title:Freitas v. J.G. Boswell Co

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1987

Citations

188 Cal.App.3d 700 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Jenson v. Kenneth I. Mullen Inc.

(6a) C S Sewers urges this court to extend the immunity provisions of section 846 to "cloak" it from…

Charpentier v. Von Geldern

(12d) Accordingly, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to defendant's willful or malicious…