From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
May 3, 2001
Criminal Case No. 4:96-CR-0068-A, (Civil Action No. 4:99-CV-0574-D) (N.D. Tex. May. 3, 2001)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 4:96-CR-0068-A, (Civil Action No. 4:99-CV-0574-D)

May 3, 2001


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.


Summaries of

Freeman v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
May 3, 2001
Criminal Case No. 4:96-CR-0068-A, (Civil Action No. 4:99-CV-0574-D) (N.D. Tex. May. 3, 2001)
Case details for

Freeman v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS LELAND FREEMAN, MOVANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: May 3, 2001

Citations

Criminal Case No. 4:96-CR-0068-A, (Civil Action No. 4:99-CV-0574-D) (N.D. Tex. May. 3, 2001)

Citing Cases

Klamath Irrigation District v. U.S.

These and other courts, often noting that the rule was modified to divorce it from strict res judicata…

Wolfsen Land Cattle Company v. U.S.

In other words, "To succeed on a motion to intervene of right under RCFC 24(a), applicants `must show that:…