From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. Ripley

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 22, 1986
339 S.E.2d 795 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

71324.

DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1986.

Action on contract. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Bruner.

F. Carter Tate, for appellant.

Richard M. Young, for appellee.


Thomas A. Ripley, Jr. brought this action against Lawrence Freeman for rent and other claims. Ripley filed a motion for sanctions for Freeman's failure to submit to discovery. The trial court granted that motion, struck Freeman's answer and counterclaim and entered judgment by default against him. Freeman appeals.

Appellant contends the trial court erred by granting appellee's motion for sanctions under OCGA § 9-11-37 (d) because appellant's failure to comply with discovery was not wilful.

The record reveals that appellant failed to appear for his deposition on two scheduled occasions despite the fact that he had been properly served with notice each time. It is uncontroverted that he had actual notice of the second scheduled deposition and that appellant had not appeared by the time it was adjourned, two hours after it had been scheduled to begin. Although appellant argues that he was en route to that deposition, the record is devoid of any explanation for appellant's failure to appear for his deposition and, in the absence of a transcript of the hearing on appellee's motion for sanctions, we must assume the evidence supported a finding that appellant's failure to appear was wilful. See generally Peek v. Duffy, 172 Ga. App. 834, 835 (1) ( 324 S.E.2d 795) (1984); Cook v. Lassiter, 159 Ga. App. 24, 25 ( 282 S.E.2d 680) (1981). "Under the discovery provisions of the Civil Practice Act, the trial judge is granted broad discretion. Historically, it has been the policy of the Georgia appellate courts to refuse to interfere with a trial court's exercise of such discretion in absence of abuse. [Cits.]" Tompkins v. McMickle, 172 Ga. App. 62, 64 (2) ( 321 S.E.2d 797) (1984). We find no abuse of the trial court's discretion. See Tompkins, supra at 63-64 (2); Merrill Lynch c., Inc. v. Echols, 138 Ga. App. 593, 594-96 (2) ( 226 S.E.2d 742) (1976).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1986.


Summaries of

Freeman v. Ripley

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 22, 1986
339 S.E.2d 795 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Freeman v. Ripley

Case Details

Full title:FREEMAN v. RIPLEY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 22, 1986

Citations

339 S.E.2d 795 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986)
339 S.E.2d 795

Citing Cases

Russell v. Wickes Lumber

The trial court was within its discretion to rule that Wickes was in compliance with the request and to deny…

Peoples v. Yu

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in the present case. Accord Freeman v. Ripley, 177 Ga. App.…