From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co.

U.S.
Oct 8, 1962
371 U.S. 829 (1962)

Summary

reaffirming the so-called "middleman-consumer" distinction

Summary of this case from Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric

Opinion

No. 228.

October 8, 1962.


ORDERS.

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. David Berger and Walter Stein for petitioners. C. Brewster Rhoads and Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr. for respondent. Reported below: 301 F. 2d 830.


Summaries of

Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co.

U.S.
Oct 8, 1962
371 U.S. 829 (1962)

reaffirming the so-called "middleman-consumer" distinction

Summary of this case from Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric
Case details for

Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co.

Case Details

Full title:FREEDMAN et al. v. PHILADELPHIA TERMINALS AUCTION Co

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 8, 1962

Citations

371 U.S. 829 (1962)

Citing Cases

Porter v. Porter

24, we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, Division 1, reported in 1 Ariz.…

LEO SPEAR CONSTR. v. FIDELITY CAS

On the other hand, we believe that no relief whatever is appropriate against either defendant on the…