From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedman v. New York Society for Suppression of Vice

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 25, 1937
274 N.Y. 559 (N.Y. 1937)

Summary

stating that the "mere [acquittal] of the plaintiff did not indicate that there was no justification for making the arrest, nor did it show that probable cause did not exist"

Summary of this case from Richardson v. City of New York

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1937

Decided May 25, 1937

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Jas. Madison Blackwell and Martin A. Nathanson for appellant.

Lee Hazen for New York Civil Liberties Committee, amicus curiae. Martin Conboy, David Asch and Francis X. Walsh for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Freedman v. New York Society for Suppression of Vice

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 25, 1937
274 N.Y. 559 (N.Y. 1937)

stating that the "mere [acquittal] of the plaintiff did not indicate that there was no justification for making the arrest, nor did it show that probable cause did not exist"

Summary of this case from Richardson v. City of New York
Case details for

Freedman v. New York Society for Suppression of Vice

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN FREEDMAN, Appellant, v. NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 25, 1937

Citations

274 N.Y. 559 (N.Y. 1937)
10 N.E.2d 550

Citing Cases

Watson v. City of New York

Where the facts and the inferences to be drawn therefrom are undisputed the issue of probable cause is one of…

Veras v. Truth Verification

In this context the terms "reasonable cause", "reasonable grounds" and "probable cause" are properly used…