From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Trate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 9, 2021
C.A. No. 20-213 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2021)

Opinion

C.A. No. 20-213 Erie

02-09-2021

LEROY FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. B. TRATE, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action for habeas corpus relief was received by the Clerk of Court July 28, 2020. In his habeas petition, Petitioner seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in the form of an Order directing the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") to release him to home confinement pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the "CARES Act"), Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020). In particular, Petitioner alleges that home confinement is warranted because he is uniquely vulnerable to the virus due to lung and kidney injuries he sustained in a 2011 shooting incident. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo, for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

On December 18, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lanzillo issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the petition be dismissed, with prejudice, because Petitioner admittedly failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and the Court is unable to grant the relief requested by Petitioner under the CARES Act in any event. [ECF No. 12]. Objections to the R&R were due to be filed by January 4, 2021; however, no objections have been received from Petitioner.

Thus, after de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2021,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED, with prejudice, and the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lanzillo, issued on December 18, 2020 [ECF No. 12], is adopted as the opinion of this Court. As there are no further matters pending before the Court relative to the instant petition, the Clerk is directed to mark this case "CLOSED."

/s/_________

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States District Judge cc: The Honorable Richard A. Lanzillo

United States Magistrate Judge

All parties of record


Summaries of

Frazier v. Trate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 9, 2021
C.A. No. 20-213 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Frazier v. Trate

Case Details

Full title:LEROY FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. B. TRATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 9, 2021

Citations

C.A. No. 20-213 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

Robertson v. Warden

Even if Robertson had exhausted his administrative remedies, the court could not direct the location for…

Reynolds v. Finley

, even if Reynolds had exhausted his administrative remedies, the court could not direct the location for…