From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Colthfelt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2020
Case Number 19-10389 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2020)

Opinion

Case Number 19-10389

02-25-2020

ALVIN FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. COLTHFELT and SCHUBRING, Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON IN FORMA PAUPERIS SCREENING

Presently before the Court is the report issued on February 7, 2020 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint and dismiss all claims and defendants except for those against defendants Colthfelt and Schubring—the only defendants remaining from the Court's prior order of dismissal (ECF No. 14). Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that all claims and defendants, except for those against defendants Colthfelt and Schubring, are DISMISSED.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Date: February 25, 2020

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first-class U.S. mail on February 25, 2020.

s/Susan K. Pinkowski

SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Frazier v. Colthfelt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2020
Case Number 19-10389 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Frazier v. Colthfelt

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. COLTHFELT and SCHUBRING, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 25, 2020

Citations

Case Number 19-10389 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

Shannon v. Risper

While Plaintiff now seeks leave to amend in response to the dismissal under the Local Rule equivalent of…

Haymer v. Minor

A plaintiff who does not attempt to amend his complaint prior to entry of judgment under Federal Rule of…