From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franko v. Ohio Chemical and Mfg. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 17, 1931
154 A. 632 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Submitted October 31, 1930 —

Decided April 17, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 376.

For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.

For the appellant, Collins Corbin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CAMPBELL, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Franko v. Ohio Chemical and Mfg. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 17, 1931
154 A. 632 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Franko v. Ohio Chemical and Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK FRANKO, RESPONDENT, v. OHIO CHEMICAL AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 17, 1931

Citations

154 A. 632 (N.J. 1931)
154 A. 632

Citing Cases

The Linseed King

Their failure to obtain compensation awards, so far as shown by the record, was not because of anything done…

Oado v. Ford Motor Co.

lure of the employer to properly report an accident of which he has notice are peculiar to a few States. But…