From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRANKLIN FACTORS CORP. v. GREEN FURS, INC

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 13, 1939
170 Misc. 229 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)

Opinion

January 13, 1939.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Nachamie Benjamin [ H. Stuart Klopper of counsel], for the appellant, respondent.

Samuel Gutterman, for the respondent, appellant.


The motion to punish for contempt should have been denied without leave to renew, since the filing of a petition for reorganization under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act ( U.S. Code, tit. 11, § 207) could not be stayed by a State court and did not constitute a contempt of court. ( Matter of Kepecs, 123 N.Y.S. 872.)

Order modified by striking out permission to renew, and, as modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs to defendant, appellant, respondent.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, FRANKENTHALER and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

FRANKLIN FACTORS CORP. v. GREEN FURS, INC

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 13, 1939
170 Misc. 229 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
Case details for

FRANKLIN FACTORS CORP. v. GREEN FURS, INC

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN FACTORS CORPORATION, Respondent, Appellant, v. LOUIS H. GREEN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1939

Citations

170 Misc. 229 (N.Y. App. Term 1939)
9 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

Wickes Boiler Co. v. Godfrey-Keeler Co.

These two decisions, as well as many others, establish that a trustee in bankruptcy (whose rights the debtor…

Thompson v. Samson United Corp.

On the other hand, it has been held not only that a State court has no power to enjoin a pending bankruptcy…