From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin County, Georgia v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 2, 1965
341 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 21230.

February 2, 1965.

J.E. Palmour, Gainesville, Ga., Andrew J. Hill, Jr., Lavonia, Ga., for appellant.

Richard N. Countiss, Dept. of Justice, Ramsey Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Floyd M. Buford, U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., Sampson M. Culpepper, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and MOORE and BELL, Circuit Judges.

Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.


The road and bridge for which the commissioners awarded only nominal damages in this case were condemned in connection with the Hartwell Dam and Reservoir project. The bridge spanned Eastanollee Creek in Franklin County, Georgia; the road involved was 2,000 feet in length and joined the bridge at each end.

No prejudicial error appears in either the appointment of or the instructions to the commissioners, nor in the award itself. Any error in the District Court's instruction that fair market value was the proper measure of compensation, rather than the value of substitute facilities, see City of Fort Worth, Texas v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 217; and State of Washington v. United States, 9 Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 33, was rendered harmless by appellant's request before the commissioners for the substitute facilities measure, and by the application of that measure by the commissioners.

The appointment of commissioners by the court, although both parties had previously requested a jury trial, was justified by the character and location of the property condemned and by the necessity of inspecting the area as to which a need for substitute facilities was claimed. It affirmatively appears from the record that the commissioners surveyed the area affected before and after the taking. Moreover, the record warrants the conclusion that substitute facilities were unnecessary, and thus that appellant was entitled to nominal damages only.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Franklin County, Georgia v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 2, 1965
341 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

Franklin County, Georgia v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN COUNTY, GEORGIA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 2, 1965

Citations

341 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

United States v. Streets, Alleys & Public Ways

United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 379-80, 63 S.Ct. 276, 282-83, 87 L.Ed. 336, 345-46 (1943); Nebraska v.…

U.S. v. Certain Land in Borough of Brooklyn

Part of the remaining area is apparently being used to provide a playground, and the Board is perhaps thereby…