From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. Poertner

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 21, 2016
577 U.S. 1230 (2016)

Summary

affirming approval of claims-made settlement offering class members between six and twelve dollars for filing a claim, as well as injunctive relief

Summary of this case from Montoya v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Opinion

No. 15–765.

03-21-2016

Theodore H. FRANK, petitioner, v. Joshua D. POERTNER, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.


Summaries of

Frank v. Poertner

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 21, 2016
577 U.S. 1230 (2016)

affirming approval of claims-made settlement offering class members between six and twelve dollars for filing a claim, as well as injunctive relief

Summary of this case from Montoya v. PNC Bank, N.A.

explaining that "district courts could also consider the twelve factors set forth in Johnson" to determine the reasonableness of a percentage fee from a common fund

Summary of this case from Family Med. Pharmacy, LLC v. Trxade Grp., Inc.
Case details for

Frank v. Poertner

Case Details

Full title:Theodore H. FRANK, petitioner, v. Joshua D. POERTNER, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 21, 2016

Citations

577 U.S. 1230 (2016)
136 S. Ct. 1453
194 L. Ed. 2d 575

Citing Cases

Williams v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC

The Eleventh Circuit has affirmed claims-made settlements affording less relief to class members than that…

Palmer v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC

See, e.g., In re Online DVD-Rental Antitrust Litig., 779 F.3d 934, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2015) (affirming district…