From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franco v. Arakelian Enterprises

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 2014
176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 265 (Cal. 2014)

Summary

extending Kirby's reasoning regarding rest breaks to meal breaks

Summary of this case from Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.

Opinion

No. S207760.

2014-08-27

FRANCO v. ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES.


Prior report: Cal.App., 149 Cal.Rptr.3d 530

The above-entitled matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One, with directions to vacate its decision and reconsider the cause in light of Iskanian v. CLS Transportation of Los Angeles (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 327 P.3d 129. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).) CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, CORRIGAN and LIU, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Franco v. Arakelian Enterprises

Supreme Court of California
Aug 27, 2014
176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 265 (Cal. 2014)

extending Kirby's reasoning regarding rest breaks to meal breaks

Summary of this case from Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.
Case details for

Franco v. Arakelian Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:FRANCO v. ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 27, 2014

Citations

176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 265 (Cal. 2014)
331 P.3d 1274

Citing Cases

Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.

California statutes provide for an award of attorney's fees for parties who prevail on actions for nonpayment…