holding that repeated, baseless opposition before an adjudicative body does not result in loss of Noerr-Pennington immunity absent conduct external to or abusive of the adjudicatory process
Summary of this case from Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Elec. Co.No. 76-1023.
March 21, 1977.
C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 542 F. 2d 1076.
holding that repeated, baseless opposition before an adjudicative body does not result in loss of Noerr-Pennington immunity absent conduct external to or abusive of the adjudicatory process
Summary of this case from Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Elec. Co.Full title:FRANCHISE REALTY INTERSTATE CORP. ET AL. v. SAN FRANCISCO LOCAL JOINT…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 21, 1977
P. Areeda D. Turner, supra, I Antitrust Law ¶ 204e2. See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking…
Webb v. Fury[I]n any case, whether antitrust or something else, where a plaintiff seeks damages or injunctive relief, or…