From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fraim v. City Sewer of Flint

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 31, 2006
474 Mich. 1101 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 129787.

March 31, 2006.


SC: 129787, COA: 253073.

Summary Dispositions.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We affirm the Court of Appeals ruling that the trial court correctly denied defendant's motion for summary disposition. However, we conclude that no material question of fact exists on the applicability of the open and obvious doctrine. The open and obvious doctrine is inapplicable to this case, because defendant did not possess or control the premises within which plaintiff was injured. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich 512, 516 (2001). We remand this case to the Genesee Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Fraim v. City Sewer of Flint

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 31, 2006
474 Mich. 1101 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

Fraim v. City Sewer of Flint

Case Details

Full title:FRAIM v. CITY SEWER OF FLINT

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 31, 2006

Citations

474 Mich. 1101 (Mich. 2006)
711 N.W.2d 83

Citing Cases

Smith v. City of Detroit

The plaintiff cross-appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order…

Finazzo v. Fire Equip. Co.

--------Plaintiff also misplaces reliance on Garrett v. Sam H. Goodman Bldg. Co., Inc. , 474 Mich. 948, 948,…