From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Grayson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 14, 1898
6 Cal. Unrep. 72 (Cal. 1898)

Opinion

          Appeal from superior court, city and county of San Francisco.

          Action of one Fox against one Grayson. From an order dissolving a temporary injunction, plaintiff appealed, and defendant moves to dismiss the appeal. Motion denied.

         COUNSEL

          W. T. Baggett, for appellant.

          Deal, Tanszky & Wells, for respondent.


          OPINION

          PER CURIAM

          Motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal from an order dissolving a temporary injunction, upon the ground that a reversal of the order would have no legal effect, and consequently that the questions raised by the appeal have become mere abstractions. It is not clear that a reversal of the order would have no legal effect. Motion denied.


Summaries of

Fox v. Grayson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 14, 1898
6 Cal. Unrep. 72 (Cal. 1898)
Case details for

Fox v. Grayson

Case Details

Full title:FOX v. GRAYSON.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 14, 1898

Citations

6 Cal. Unrep. 72 (Cal. 1898)
6 Cal. Unrep. 72

Citing Cases

Erickson v. Boothe

( Hartke v. Abbott, 106 Cal.App. 388 [ 289 P. 206])." Also see Fox v. Grayson, 6 Cal. Unrep. 72 [53 P. 932].…

Stout v. McNab

"The law requires a gift causa mortis to be absolute at the time it is given, but adds to it the condition…