From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fountain v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 30, 1998
231 Ga. App. 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

finding that counsel's decision to elicit a defendant's criminal history was not prejudicial considering the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt

Summary of this case from State v. Shelnutt

Opinion

A98A0143.

DECIDED MARCH 30, 1998.

Drug violation. Cherokee Superior Court. Before Judge Mills.

Gregory A. Hicks, for appellant.

Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Cecelia Harris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Lonnie Fountain was convicted of possession of methamphetamine. The sole error enumerated on appeal alleges ineffective assistance of counsel.

This case arose as Fountain met his ex-wife in a gas station parking lot to deliver child support. A deputy saw him, inquired as to his identity, radioed that information to a dispatcher, and learned of a outstanding warrant for Fountain's arrest for violating a temporary restraining order. The deputy arrested Fountain and transported him to the jail, where he was searched. Three baggies of methamphetamine were discovered on his person.

At trial, Fountain's counsel began his direct examination by asking Fountain how he got involved with Pickens County. Fountain testified that five years before, he had been arrested on a drug charge and was in fact guilty. Fountain then explained that as a condition of his probation he covertly began assisting with drug interdiction in Pickens County, making several buys. Fountain's defense was that he had purchased the methamphetamine to assist law enforcement authorities. Held:

Fountain argues that his trial counsel's decision to introduce evidence of his criminal record constituted ineffective assistance. We disagree.

To establish ineffectiveness, a defendant must prove that his trial counsel's performance was deficient and but for the deficiency there was a reasonable probability the result of the trial would have been different. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 ( 104 S.C. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674) (1984); Brown v. State, 257 Ga. 277, 278 (2) ( 357 S.E.2d 590) (1987). Review of counsel's performance, however, must be highly deferential. Rogers v. State, 195 Ga. App. 446, 448 (2) ( 394 S.E.2d 116) (1990). Tactical errors do not constitute ineffective assistance. Keanum v. State, 212 Ga. App. 662, 664 (3) ( 442 S.E.2d 790) (1994).

The trial court's conclusion that counsel's decision to elicit Fountain's criminal history was tactical is not clearly erroneous. Wingfield v. State, 226 Ga. App. 448, 450 (4) ( 486 S.E.2d 676) (1997). Fountain bore the burden of presenting evidence establishing his trial counsel's ineffectiveness. Lowery v. State, 212 Ga. App. 870, 871 ( 443 S.E.2d 304) (1994). His failure to secure trial counsel as a witness at the motion for new trial hearing authorized the trial court's conclusion, particularly when the record shows that counsel used Fountain's prior conviction as an explanation for his sole defense, that he obtained the contraband to aid the State. Id. Further, the evidence was sufficiently overwhelming to prevent Fountain from showing prejudice.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, P.J., and Johnson, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 30, 1998.


Summaries of

Fountain v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 30, 1998
231 Ga. App. 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

finding that counsel's decision to elicit a defendant's criminal history was not prejudicial considering the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt

Summary of this case from State v. Shelnutt
Case details for

Fountain v. State

Case Details

Full title:FOUNTAIN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 30, 1998

Citations

231 Ga. App. 700 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
500 S.E.2d 614

Citing Cases

State v. Shelnutt

Moreover, any testimony elicited about whether Shelnutt could have lawfully possessed a firearm or had a…

Davis v. State

While he did not expect appellant to be questioned about the videotape, trial counsel stated he did not think…