From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fountain v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
May 29, 1992
598 So. 2d 1026 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)

Summary

holding that a defendant cannot assume inconsistent positions at trial and on appeal

Summary of this case from Robinson v. State

Opinion

3 Div. 129.

January 17, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 28, 1992. Certiorari Denied May 29, 1992 Alabama Supreme Court 1910902.

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court; Randall Thomas and Joseph Phelps, Trial Judges.

David G. Flack, Montgomery, for appellant.

Don Siegelman and James H. Evans, Attys. Gen., and James B. Prude, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


ON RETURN TO REMAND


Tony Fountain appealed from convictions and sentences on charges of rape in the first degree and kidnapping in the second degree. He was sentenced to 40 years in the state penitentiary on the rape charge and 30 years on the kidnapping charge.

The case was remanded to the trial court, 586 So.2d 277, because in the court's order, the court directed that the sentences were to run consecutively in one place, and in another place the court directed that the sentences were to run concurrently.

After remand, the trial court corrected the sentence orders to show that the court intended that the sentences in the rape charge, CC-87-684, and the kidnapping charge, CC-87-685, were to run consecutively.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a former Alabama Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.


Summaries of

Fountain v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
May 29, 1992
598 So. 2d 1026 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)

holding that a defendant cannot assume inconsistent positions at trial and on appeal

Summary of this case from Robinson v. State
Case details for

Fountain v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tony FOUNTAIN v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 29, 1992

Citations

598 So. 2d 1026 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

Moreover, at the sentencing hearing, the appellant's counsel conceded that the sale occurred within three…

Lewis v. State

A `trial judge is not required to repeat any other part of his oral charge when answering a specific inquiry…