From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fotomat Corp. v. Photovest Corp.

U.S.
Mar 3, 1980
445 U.S. 917 (1980)

Summary

reversing the portion of an order dismissing charges because the trial court failed to forewarn the prosecutor dismissal would be with prejudice

Summary of this case from Jamestown v. Snellman

Opinion

No. 79-1137.

March 3, 1980.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 606 F. 2d 704.


Summaries of

Fotomat Corp. v. Photovest Corp.

U.S.
Mar 3, 1980
445 U.S. 917 (1980)

reversing the portion of an order dismissing charges because the trial court failed to forewarn the prosecutor dismissal would be with prejudice

Summary of this case from Jamestown v. Snellman

recognizing the copyright misuse defense

Summary of this case from DSC Communications Corp. v. DGI Technologies, Inc.
Case details for

Fotomat Corp. v. Photovest Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FOTOMAT CORP. v. PHOTOVEST CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 3, 1980

Citations

445 U.S. 917 (1980)

Citing Cases

G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch

In proving whether the defendant possessed sufficient power to come dangerously close to achieving monopoly…

United States v. Tariq

This would indicate bad faith on the part of the prosecution; however, a showing of bad faith is not…