From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Price

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Nov 5, 2009
No. 05-09-00638-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)

Summary

In Foster v. Wiley (27 Mich. 244), the plaintiff's property was taken and sold under an execution wrongfully issued at the instance of the defendant's attorney after an appeal had been taken and it was held that the defendant was liable in trespass.

Summary of this case from Poucher v. Blanchard

Opinion

No. 05-09-00638-CV

Opinion Filed November 5, 2009.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-01703-D.

Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices O'NEILL and MURPHY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The Court has before it appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant states he no longer desires to pursue the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.


Summaries of

Foster v. Price

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Nov 5, 2009
No. 05-09-00638-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)

In Foster v. Wiley (27 Mich. 244), the plaintiff's property was taken and sold under an execution wrongfully issued at the instance of the defendant's attorney after an appeal had been taken and it was held that the defendant was liable in trespass.

Summary of this case from Poucher v. Blanchard
Case details for

Foster v. Price

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FOSTER, Appellant v. JOHN WILEY PRICE, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

No. 05-09-00638-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

White v. Harris

An appeal bond, to operate as a supersedeas, must serve the uses and furnish the benefits contemplated by…

Saveski v. California Savings

This is so because if in fact defendant knew or should have known of the dual occupancy it could have been…