From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 20, 1969
410 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1969)

Opinion

Nos. 357-361, Dockets 32969-32973.

Argued March 11, 1969.

Decided March 20, 1969.

William K. Kerr, New York City (Charles H. Walker, Herbert F. Schwartz, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

Robert H. Rines, Boston, Mass. (Alexander Kahan, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORE, KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edmund L. Palmieri, J., holding certain claims of Patent No. 2,882,384, issued to plaintiff Julius E. Foster, valid and infringed by American Machine Foundry Company and other named defendants. On appeal, defendants do not contest the validity and enforceability of the patent and raise only the issue whether they infringed. We have considered the briefs and arguments in this court and see no basis for disturbing Judge Palmieri's findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to infringement. On that issue, we affirm on the basis of his careful opinion. 297 F. Supp. 512.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 20, 1969
410 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Foster v. Magnetic Heating Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Julius E. FOSTER, Appellee, v. MAGNETIC HEATING CORPORATION, Thermatool…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 20, 1969

Citations

410 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Marvin Glass Associates v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

She did not deliberately withhold her invention from the public and thereby forfeit the right to her…

Leinoff v. Louis Milona Sons

Where there is evidence that defendants relied on any delay by patentee or were lulled into any position to…