From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Drew

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 11, 2010
360 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-6708.

Submitted: December 17, 2009.

Decided: January 11, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00118-GCM).

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Bobby O. Foster, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foster v. Drew, No. 3:09-cv-00118-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Foster v. Drew

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 11, 2010
360 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Foster v. Drew

Case Details

Full title:Bobby O. FOSTER, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. DREW, Warden, FCI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

Citations

360 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Grapes v. Rocque

* * * * The person who makes a tender does it because it is the amount or balance that he concedes to be due,…

Davies v. Dow

The tender was sufficient under the rule stated in Moore v. Norman, 43 Minn. 428, 52 Minn. 83. See Edwards v.…