From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Burton, Judge

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 26, 1924
232 P. 917 (Utah 1924)

Opinion

No. 4225.

Decided December 26, 1924.

J.M. Foster, of Cedar City, and Wm. B. Higgins, of Fillmore, for plaintiff.

Sam Cline, of Milford, for defendant.


This is a companion case to the case of Higgins v. Burton, just decided, 64 Utah ___, 232 P. 914. The facts are the same in this case as in that one.

Upon the authority of that case, therefore, it is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandate issue forthwith, requiring the said district courts and the Hon. Thomas H. Burton as judge thereof to permit the plaintiff to appear and practice before said courts and such judge, and that he be restored to all of his rights and privileges as an attorney and counselor at law in accordance with the certificate issued to him by this court. Neither party to recover costs.

WEBER, C.J., and GIDEON, THURMAN, and CHERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Foster v. Burton, Judge

Supreme Court of Utah
Dec 26, 1924
232 P. 917 (Utah 1924)
Case details for

Foster v. Burton, Judge

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. HON. THOS. H. BURTON, as Judge, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Dec 26, 1924

Citations

232 P. 917 (Utah 1924)
64 Utah 550

Citing Cases

In re Burton

The act of the accused in thus denying the right to these attorneys to practice was, by order of this court,…