From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortec Constructors v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 31, 1986
804 F.2d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

Opinion

Appeal No. 86-960.

October 31, 1986.

Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. James R. Thornton, Jr., Dept. of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of counsel.

David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie Sims, Jackson, Miss., argued for appellee.

Before RICH, SMITH, and NIES, Circuit Judges.


The United States appeals from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, reported at 8 Cl.Ct. 490 (1985), awarding Fortec Constructors delay damages, an extension of contract time, interest, and costs. We affirm.

OPINION

Upon consideration of each of the government's arguments, we conclude that the government has failed to establish any error in the court's analysis. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Yock's opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Fortec Constructors v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 31, 1986
804 F.2d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Case details for

Fortec Constructors v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1986

Citations

804 F.2d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

Citing Cases

Southern Comfort Builders, Inc. v. U.S.

However, in order to properly demonstrate delay to a project, the CPM schedule must be kept current to…

George Sollitt Construction Co. v. U.S.

Accurate CPM schedule updates are required during the course of construction to reflect delays and shifts in…