From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Former Employees of Murray Engineering v. U.S.

United States Court of International Trade
Jun 25, 2003
Court No. 03-00219, SLIP OP. 03-71 (Ct. Int'l Trade Jun. 25, 2003)

Opinion

Court No. 03-00219, SLIP OP. 03-71

June 25, 2003


ORDER


Upon consideration of the defendant's consent motion for voluntary remand, it is hereby

ORDERED that the consent motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that this action is remanded to the United States Department of Labor to conduct a further investigation and to make a redetermination as to whether petitioners are eligible for certification for worker adjustment assistance benefits; and it is further

ORDERED that remand results shall be filed no later than 60 days after the date of this order; and it is further

ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file papers with the Court indicating whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results no later than 30 days after the remand results are filed with the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of (1) the answer pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(A); and (2) the administrative record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2635(d)(1) and Rule 72(a) shall be extended to 30 days after the plaintiffs indicate whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results.


Summaries of

Former Employees of Murray Engineering v. U.S.

United States Court of International Trade
Jun 25, 2003
Court No. 03-00219, SLIP OP. 03-71 (Ct. Int'l Trade Jun. 25, 2003)
Case details for

Former Employees of Murray Engineering v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:FORMER EMPLOYEES OF MURRAY ENGINEERING, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of International Trade

Date published: Jun 25, 2003

Citations

Court No. 03-00219, SLIP OP. 03-71 (Ct. Int'l Trade Jun. 25, 2003)

Citing Cases

Former Employees of Murray Engineering, Inc. v. Chao

Labor first voluntarily remanded this case for further investigation as to whether the plaintiffs' company…