From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foote v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 4, 2009
Case No. CIV-09-0219-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-0219-F.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


This action is brought by petitioner, a state prisoner appearing pro se, for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 30, 2009, Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be denied. (Report, doc. no. 18.) The Report advised petitioner that failure to timely object to the Report waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues addressed in the Report. Petitioner has not responded to the Report and has not asked for an extension of time within which to respond.

With no objection having been filed, the court, after review, hereby ADOPTS, ACCEPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Couch. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.


Summaries of

Foote v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 4, 2009
Case No. CIV-09-0219-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Foote v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS FOOTE, Petitioner, v. DAVID PARKER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-0219-F (W.D. Okla. Nov. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Pica v. Cross County Construction Corp.

The implication of such a grant is not even assisted by a clause in the deed granting all the rights,…

Ward v. Warren

It is true that it is said in some of the text-books and decided cases, that to constitute an easement by…