From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folsom v. Billy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1920
189 P. 188 (Okla. 1920)

Opinion

No. 10993

Opinion Filed April 13, 1920.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

1. Appeal and Error — Record — Motions — Exceptions — Review.

Motions presented to the trial court, the rulings thereon, and the exceptions thereto are not properly part of the record, and can only be preserved and presented for review on appeal by incorporating same in a bill of exceptions or case-made.

2. Same — Record Proper — Motion for New Trial.

A motion for new trial and the action of the court in overruling the same being no part of the record proper, the assignment that the court erred in overruling the motion cannot be presented to this court by transcript of the record.

Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge.

Action by Watson Billy against P.W. Folsom and others for forcible entry and detainer. From judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants bring error, Dismissed.

Sam H. Butler, for plaintiffs in error.

Bond Kolb and T.A. Morgan, for defendant in error.


It appears on motion to dismiss this appeal that judgment was rendered for restitution of the premises described in the petition, and from a judgment overruling motion for new trial this appeal was prose cuted by transcript, without bill of exceptions or case-made.

Motions presented to the trial court, and the rulings thereon, are not properly part of the record, and can only be preserved and presented for review on appeal by incorporating same in a bill of exceptions or case-made. Lawton Grain Co. v. Brunswig, 72 Oklahoma, 179 P. 465; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 P. 204; Putnam v. Western Bank Supply Co., 38 Okla. 152, 132 P. 483.

The motion for new trial and the action of the court in overruling same being no part of the record proper, the assignment that the court erred in overruling the motion cannot be presented to this court by transcript of record. Williams v. Kelly, supra.

The motion will be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

RAINEY, PITCHFORD, McNEILL, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Folsom v. Billy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 13, 1920
189 P. 188 (Okla. 1920)
Case details for

Folsom v. Billy

Case Details

Full title:FOLSOM et al. v. BILLY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 13, 1920

Citations

189 P. 188 (Okla. 1920)
78 Okla. 146

Citing Cases

Van Zant v. Reed

The appellant cannot avail herself of the error of the court in overruling the demurrer; she should have…

Samuel Dodsworth Book Co. v. Fulcher

Where case-made is not served until the expiration of the time allowed by a valid order of the court…